The crowning event of our book club year is our annual get together to review the year and rank our reads. One of the intriguing and fun aspects of this is how our scores change over the year and how (when forced to rank) as a complete series the measures compare to our monthly evaluation of the books.
This year we enjoyed the hospitality of the Royal Irish Yacht Club courtesy of one of our distinguished members. The atmosphere was warm, convivial and wonderfully festive. The company a pleasure as always and the ranking spectacular good fun. Continue reading
The Gentleman’s Book Club was inaugurated in April 2011 following late night deliberations during the count for the General Election of that year. After some discussion we settled on meeting in Smyth’s pub to share our thoughts on our first read. The location has remained our favoured haunt although we have on occasion strayed. Our numbers have remained constant and remain a very convivial 7 to today. December has become the month when we choose a ‘lighter’ read and gather to reflect on our reads of the year as part of a ‘Eurovision’ style ranking of the 12 reads of the year.
We remain vibrantly engaged with our reads (some of which have our brief reviews linked) which over the years include: Continue reading
by Sylvie Simmons
The biggest challenge in reviewing the book was in separating the author’s work from the life being recounted and it was especially hard as we remembered the man. The recommendation could of course have not been more timely and I for one certainly am glad for having read it at this time over Mr Dylan. Continue reading
by Lee Childs
Last night’s symposium shed little light on Mr Reacher. In fairness, it was chosen as a lighter read to follow the highly appreciated but magnitudinally-challenging biography of Hamilton. In that light I think it passed the bar – although lighter it was also definitely darker. I think the consensus was that it did not masquerade as higher literature, offer intricate plot or character development but it did end up delivering predictable entertainment. Continue reading
by Ron Chernow
We had a short, succinct, deep and efficient meeting tonight affording me the luxury of reporting back promptly.
There was no dissension amongst our compact cabal. As we gushed ver Hamilton we are grateful to Fergal for the suggestion. Continue reading
by Jessie Burton
All reported completed reading The Miniaturist and thanks for the mail in reviews from those not attending.
Reviews came out largely, solidly favourable and despite a few quibbles and this made for a lively discussion. One glaring issue emerged around the title and the character referenced by the title. Continue reading
by Peter Frankopan
Thanks again to Brian for sharing his thoughts in advance. A fine review covering in fine detail aspects which certainly helped stimulate our discussion.
There were mixed, but I think generally favourable reactions to the book as a whole – noting that some were reading it and others having it read to them by a rather poor narrator. Continue reading
The last week found me teasing out techniques for working with sidenotes as alternative to footnotes or endnotes. In a contentually brilliant PhD Dissertation on timelines as a digital collection visualisation tool – I was concurrently impressed by the quality of the layout of the entire dissertation to enhance readability. Florian Kräutli’s dissertation 1 is a great example of having some latitude to take the reader into account and make the content of a PhD dissertation usable beyond merely submitting it to check a box. Continue reading
by hanya yanagihara
As always the spirit of discussion rises above the apparent literary quality of the book discussed. In this case the literary quality is actually not in question and seemed to be generally respected and admired.
However, there was rather a divided house around A Little Life. Continue reading