Archives for category: Speakers

Naru Shi­ode from the Uni­ver­sity at Buf­falo gave a spell­bind­ing present­a­tion on spatial-temporal ana­lysis at the Centre for Spa­tial Ana­lysis (CSpA) on Fri­day. buffaloisometric.jpgShi­ode is trained as archi­tect and urban plan­ner and finds him­self in the Geo­graphy depart­ment at Buf­falo. He has been asso­ci­ated with pro­jects such as Digital Egypt and the Vir­tual Ryoanji pro­jects explor­ing ancient his­tor­ical recon­struc­tion as well as time-based recre­morph­ing. His cur­rent pro­ject is the 3D Buf­falo pro­ject which allows a user to inter­act via a chro­no­slider that trig­gers time points for each build­ing within a multi-block area sur­round­ing down­town Buf­falo. This pro­ject is only in its early stages, but the poten­tial for his­tor­ical ana­lysis is tre­mend­ously prom­ising.
Read the rest of this entry »

Geof­frey Reaume from York and Uni­ver­sity of Toronto gave a fas­cin­at­ing talk in the His­tory of Health and Medi­cine Lunch­time Sem­inar Series today. “From Act­iv­ists to Arch­iv­ists: Doc­u­ment­ing Mad People’s His­tory Since the 1970s,” explored both the form­a­tion of psy­chi­at­ric sur­viv­ors organ­iz­a­tions reaumewall.jpgfrom the 1970s as well as the col­lec­tion of arti­facts allow­ing for study of these move­ments.
His talk reminded us of Allen Mark­man in NY, Ken­neth Don­ald­son in Port­land then more dir­ectly of local per­son­al­it­ies such as Mel Stark­man and Don Weitz. Reaume’s talk provided me with a won­der­ful expos­ure to the more human side of the men­tal health world and also put it into the con­text of other groups within soci­ety that battle with nam­ing con­ven­tions. Very poignantly, Reaume also exposed the tre­mend­ously con­ten­tious area of attempt­ing to remem­ber the past when treat­ment has often been under­taken to elim­in­ate such remem­brances.
Reaume is cur­rently engaged in two ongo­ing attempts to ensure that those that have been par­ti­cipants (will­ingly or unwill­ingly) in Toronto asylums past are not for­got­ten. The walls of the old Queen Street Asylum have been the site of local devel­op­ment over the past dec­ade. Read the rest of this entry »

When is a tool, not a tool? Appar­ently when it is a quasi-tool or a proto-tool. A tool provides func­tion­less func­tion­al­ity. ballen.jpg
These were a couple of the epi­gra­mat­ics Barry Allen shared dur­ing a talk on tech­no­logy, cul­ture and civil­iz­a­tion.1
I could not pos­sibly do justice to philo­soph­ical reflec­tions on the nature of a tool, so I stop there on the philo­soph­ical and refer you to my foot­note, but as an eco­nom­ist I was par­tic­u­larly drawn into his dis­cus­sion of the pro­gres­sion from first to second order machines. First order being ‘devices that extend human capa­cit­ies by exploit­ing a mech­an­ical advant­age’ and second-order fea­tur­ing ‘an assembly of first-order machines, coupled to pro­duce a mul­tiply­ing effect.’ This form of organ­iz­a­tion seemed to dove­tail with a sim­ilar dis­cus­sion that Allen raised about our abil­ity to effect­ively fix prices, but our seem­ing imab­il­ity to determ­ine the true cost of a tool. Read the rest of this entry »

  1. Quasi-tools as I under­stand are objects used by beings without con­scious or intel­li­gent aware­ness that the object provides any par­tic­u­lar func­tion. Innate use of a pebble by a wasp to block the entrance to a birth cham­ber for example. In con­trast, a proto-tool, is con­sciously chosen for use, but has not be fash­ioned to per­form that func­tion, lack­ing delib­er­ate design to enable that func­tion. A ‘tool’ per se shares two descript­ive aspects: that its func­tion is man­i­fold and not lim­ited by pur­pose, instead exten­ded by tech­nique to form cul­tural tech­no­logy. Secondly, the tool is an arti­fact that lacks defin­i­tion without hav­ing a place within an eco­nomy — that is, it has been pre­vi­ously linked to oth­ers in an eco­nomy of socially com­pli­ment­ary action (design, man­u­fac­ture, sale, license, etc.) when we engage with it. []

What a treat! I had had the hon­our of meet­ing and spend­ing the last two days chat­ting with Fernanda Vié­gas from the Visual Com­mu­nic­a­tions Lab. fernanda.gifHer work has been and con­tin­ues to be inspir­a­tional for me per­son­ally and to the inform­a­tion visu­al­isa­tion com­munity more sub­stan­tially. She presen­ted a tan­tal­iz­ing talk at the Social Network/ing con­fer­ence at OISE/UofT. ‘Visu­al­iz­ing and Ana­lyz­ing Social Net­works’ quickly demon­strated a small facet of Many Eyes to a new audi­ence and gave us a sneak pre­view of a new tool soon to be avail­able through ManyEyes called Pivot­Graph. The logic of the Pivot­Graph is one of those ah-ha moments — it makes all the sense in the world, but leave it to Fernanda and Mar­tin Wat­ten­berg to visu­al­ize the prob­lem, and come up with a bril­liant way to solve it. Con­sider that social net­works have tra­di­tion­ally been visu­al­ized in two ways: the node-link map and the mat­rix. The com­mon to node-link method is very intu­it­ive, but also becomes quickly cluttered and loses visu­al­iz­a­tion value as the scale of the net­work being mapped grows. The second is the rep­res­ent­at­ive mat­rix, which scales very well, but sac­ri­fices intu­ition for clar­ity. Real­iz­ing that there had to be a way of com­bin­ing the strengths and min­im­iz­ing the weak­nesses, the Pivot­Graph hybrid­ize these two forms using a col­lapsible node-link meta­phor that, inter­act­ively aggreg­ates like nodes and allows for focus on indi­vidual vec­tors. It’s noth­ing short of amaz­ing to see in action! Read the rest of this entry »

Avi Gold­farb presen­ted a fast, con­cise and effect­ive dis­cus­sion of what con­clu­sions could be drawn about multi-institutional goldfarb.gifcol­lab­or­a­tion between US uni­ver­sit­ies dur­ing the era of Bit­NET adop­tion, 1981 — 1990. A bit of inter­net his­tory, my ears perked up imme­di­ately. His more gen­eral fram­ing ques­tion: How do changes in col­la­bour­a­tion cost change how we pro­duce know­ledge.
His study examined 270 insti­tu­tions as they con­nec­ted to the BiT­NET dur­ing this period and cross-indexed this with the num­ber of coau­thored journal art­icles sub­sequently pro­duced. Goldfarb’s paper ‘Restruc­tur­ing Research: Com­mu­nic­a­tion Costs and the Demo­crat­iz­a­tion of Uni­ver­sity Innov­a­tion’ con­cludes that col­lab­or­a­tion was enhanced, but that the gain to insti­tu­tions was not uni­formly real­ized and phys­ical dis­tance between col­la­bour­at­ors remained a factor. Read the rest of this entry »

Des­pite tech­nical dif­fi­culties (presenter’s worst night­mare — LCD pro­jector bulb burnout), Steve East­er­brook demon­strated the use­ful­ness of steve.gifcom­par­ing soft­ware struc­tures to social net­works of developers to meas­ure oper­a­tional effect­ive­ness. His well argued and logical present­a­tion ‘Increas­ing Shared Under­stand­ing in Soft­ware Teams through Informal Know­ledge Trans­fer Net­works’ exten­ded Conway’s Law to social net­work ana­lysis. This tech­nique of meas­ur­ing socio-technical con­gru­ence is espe­cially valu­able in lar­ger scale devel­op­ment pro­jects, where it is prob­ably less obvi­ous about whether a devel­op­ment pro­cess is func­tion­ing effect­iv­elly. By min­ing the data rich envir­on­ment of com­mu­nic­a­tion and revi­sion logs, it is pos­sible to gen­er­ate a social net­work map of developer inter­ac­tion that can be con­nec­ted to a soft­ware devel­op­ment schem­atic to determ­ine Socio-Technical con­gru­ence. Read the rest of this entry »

Social Network/ing Week at the Uni­ver­sity of Toronto kicked off tonight with a fas­cin­at­ing key­note by Cornell’s Jon Klein­berg. kleinberg.gif‘The Geo­graphy of Social and Inform­a­tion Net­works,’ was one of the most fas­cin­at­ing applied math­em­at­ical lec­tures I can say to hav­ing ever atten­ded (and before I go too far I will stress that the math was made very, very approach­able for a layper­son such as myself). His intro­du­cer indic­ated that he inven­ted algorithmic soci­ology and although this soun­ded rather pre­sump­tu­ous (an Al Gore and the Inter­net sort of thing?), I can’t help but be quite will­ing to give this some cre­dence after listen­ing to this present­a­tion.
Klein­berg opened with a quote from Jim Gray, that “the emer­gence of cyber­space and the world wide web was like the dis­cov­ery of a new con­tin­ent.” Klein­berg was quite delib­er­ate in this jux­ta­pos­i­tion of the geo­graphic with the tech­no­lo­gical and he then teased this into a fur­ther merge with the social. But he ques­tioned whether maps are actu­ally an appro­pri­ate meta­phor for some­thing as aphys­ical as social net­works — but chose to let this stand on the need to have some com­mon vocab­u­lary with which to be able to relate. Read the rest of this entry »

Inform­a­tion Aes­thet­ics, a con­sist­ently click­able and not­able blog, has Fernanda Vié­gas report­ing back from theinfovis.gif InfoVis Con­fer­ence in Sac­re­mento this week. She has pos­ted a geat sum­mary of the key­note address by Mat­thew Eric­son. Brent Fitzger­ald blogged yes­ter­day about the panel that he, Fernanda, Mar­tin Wat­ten­berg and Hans Rosling are present­ing as well. Tak­ing a look at the con­fer­ence pro­gramme, I could not but wish I was there. Thanks for Fernanda (and hope­fully Brent) for giv­ing us an exper­i­ence as close to being there as possible.

By the way, today is the day of Fig, 7 Bru­maire, An CCXVI.

Update: Some­thing local and excit­ing: Social Net­work­ing Week at the Uni­ver­sity of Toronto. Fernanda is speak­ing on Friday.

The Wilson Centre for Cana­dian His­tory was priv­ileged to have John H Thompson speak today on “Man­aging in the Bush Leagues: The Canada-US Rela­tion­ship since 2001.” thompson.gifThompson’s lively talk was marked by his per­sonal reflec­tions on what it’s like to be an advising Cana­dian, one who has moved per­man­ently to the US and on his per­spect­ive as a stu­dent of United States — Cana­dian rela­tions from one liv­ing in the heart of the beast.
His pithy present­a­tion was enfra­granced with a num­ber of well chosen edit­or­ial car­toons from both Cana­dian and Amer­ican papers and by a couple of rather loaded quo­ta­tions. His talk was loosely framed by an explor­a­tion of the rela­tion­ship between coun­tries dur­ing the pres­id­ency of George W Bush, and intro­duced by a short ret­ro­spect­ive of rela­tions between Cana­dian Prime Min­is­ters and Pres­id­ents from Mack­en­zie King. Read the rest of this entry »

The His­tory of Health and Medi­cine Sem­inar series con­tin­ued today with a rather pro­voc­at­ive paper by Dr. Ann Her­ring and Sta­cey Lock­er­bie.herring.gif “The Com­ing Plague: Global panic, local reper­cus­sions and avian influ­enza,” con­tends that glob­al­iz­a­tion and spread of inform­a­tion has pre­ceded the poten­tial epi­demic with out­comes that alarm poten­tially unduly and have enorm­ous local eco­nomic and social impact.
Her­ring is well known for her work on the his­tory of infec­tious dis­ease and very spe­cific­ally on its impact on nat­ive pop­u­la­tions. Lock­er­bie work involves the trans­ition of aquacul­ture in cent­ral Viet­nam from local to a global com­mod­ity. Their work coin­cides as a res­ult of Lockerbie’s first-hand exper­i­ence in Viet­nam with the impact of poultry culls and the move­ment towards lar­ger state-controlled fact­ory oper­a­tions as the gov­ern­ment (over)reacted to the bird flu. Read the rest of this entry »