Eric Fisc­her has pos­ted a new series of visu­al­isa­tions ‘Loc­als and Tour­ists’ depict­ing the loc­a­tion of pho­tos taken in urban areas around the world. In this series he attempts to dis­tin­guish between those taken by tour­ists (people who seem to be a local of a dif­fer­ent city and who took pic­tures in this city for less than a month) and those by loc­als (people who have taken pic­tures in this city dated over a range of a month or more). Intriguing.

What imme­di­ately struck me was his ingeni­ous re-use of the exist­ing data to cre­ate new inform­a­tion. By explor­ing indi­vidu­als pos­ted pic­tures over time he was able to hypo­thes­ise as to whether they were vis­it­ing or resid­ing in a par­tic­u­lar area. This allowed for a means to com­pare the gaze of the two groups.

I imme­di­ately star­ted to explore his map of Dub­lin to see if any pat­terns emerged and then to try and sug­gest explan­a­tions for them. There is a healthy and reg­u­lar mix of pho­tos by both groups in the cent­ral core, but imme­di­ately to the east is a large blue box of pho­tos taken by loc­als. It appears to sur­round the new Aviva Lans­downe Sta­dium in Balls­bridge. Addi­tion­ally on the north­side the National Botan­ical Gar­dens have a heavy con­cen­tra­tion of pho­to­graphs by locals.

The most prac­tical applic­a­tion of Loc­als versus tour­ists is to con­sider how a vis­itor might use these visu­al­isa­tions to find the hid­den city known only to its inhab­it­ants — to find those secret spots worthy of cap­ture by loc­als, but seem­ingly missed in the tour­ist guides.

This set builds on his earlier work ‘The Geot­ag­gers’ World Atlas’ look­ing at from where the pic­tures were taken, whether from car, bicyle or when walking.