<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Anticipation…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shawnday.com/randomosity/2007/01/10/links-for-2007-01-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shawnday.com/randomosity/2007/01/10/links-for-2007-01-11/</link>
	<description>strikingly random thoughts and &#039;maximum data existentialisation&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawnday</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnday.com/randomosity/2007/01/10/links-for-2007-01-11/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>shawnday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnday.com/randomosity/2007/01/10/links-for-2007-01-11/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>And one more comment. It didn&#039;t take too long, here&#039;s a little &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.brighthand.com/showthread.php?t=235591&quot; target=&quot;-blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;launcher application for the Palm&lt;/a&gt; that gives you iPhone interface on your Palm. Again maybe just enough to tine one over until June.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one more comment. It didn’t take too long, here’s a little <a href="http://forum.brighthand.com/showthread.php?t=235591" target="-blank" rel="nofollow">launcher application for the Palm</a> that gives you iPhone interface on your Palm. Again maybe just enough to tine one over until June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawnday</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnday.com/randomosity/2007/01/10/links-for-2007-01-11/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>shawnday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnday.com/randomosity/2007/01/10/links-for-2007-01-11/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>And if you have a little model of the phone....then you need the more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iphoneunboxed.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;elabourate packaging&lt;/a&gt; for the fake unboxing. A cool product is certainly driving brilliant creativity from the fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you have a little model of the phone.…then you need the more <a href="http://www.iphoneunboxed.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">elabourate packaging</a> for the fake unboxing. A cool product is certainly driving brilliant creativity from the fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawnday</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnday.com/randomosity/2007/01/10/links-for-2007-01-11/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>shawnday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawnday.com/randomosity/2007/01/10/links-for-2007-01-11/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>As a further point, there is an &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/01/update_on_ciscos_iphone_tradem.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interesting commentary&lt;/a&gt; on the Cisco suit by their general counsel, Mark Chandler. It is forthright and answers some of the questions swirling about this strange situation. Those following the swirling iPhone rumours over the past few months (years?) noted that Cisco released a product called iPhone a few weeks back clearly delineating the fact that they owned the rights to the name iPhone. Hence surprise that the product announced yesterday shared this name. But all seemed ok when Steve told us that he expected a settlement with Cisco later that day. The assumption of course being that they just had an i or two to dot. Then today came the suit. The commentary referenced above tells an interesting story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a further point, there is an <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/01/update_on_ciscos_iphone_tradem.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">interesting commentary</a> on the Cisco suit by their general counsel, Mark Chandler. It is forthright and answers some of the questions swirling about this strange situation. Those following the swirling iPhone rumours over the past few months (years?) noted that Cisco released a product called iPhone a few weeks back clearly delineating the fact that they owned the rights to the name iPhone. Hence surprise that the product announced yesterday shared this name. But all seemed ok when Steve told us that he expected a settlement with Cisco later that day. The assumption of course being that they just had an i or two to dot. Then today came the suit. The commentary referenced above tells an interesting story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

